https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441372 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the demand of Rs. 78,38,768/- along with interest and penalties. The appellant's arguments were rejected, confirming liability for service tax under 'Broadcasting Service' for the specified period. The Tribunal found that the appellant had misrepresented their activities to evade tax, justifying the imposition of penalties under Section 77 and Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1944. en-us Fri, 04 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Aug 2023 07:26:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441372 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the demand of Rs. 78,38,768/- along with interest and penalties. The appellant's arguments were rejected, confirming liability for service tax under 'Broadcasting Service' for the specified period. The Tribunal found that the appellant had misrepresented their activities to evade tax, justifying the imposition of penalties under Section 77 and Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1944. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 04 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441372