<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 151 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33561</link>
    <description>The appellants, in a case concerning failure to file returns and discharge service tax liability, contested penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act. Despite financial constraints, the Commissioner upheld penalties under Sections 77 and 78 but reduced the penalty under Section 78 to Rs. 46,000. The penalty under Section 76 was dropped. The appeal was partially allowed, resulting in reduced penalties for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 151 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33561</link>
      <description>The appellants, in a case concerning failure to file returns and discharge service tax liability, contested penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act. Despite financial constraints, the Commissioner upheld penalties under Sections 77 and 78 but reduced the penalty under Section 78 to Rs. 46,000. The penalty under Section 76 was dropped. The appeal was partially allowed, resulting in reduced penalties for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>