https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441365 The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's application under Section 311 Cr.P.C., finding the petitioner's conduct to be an abuse of the legal process. The petitioner's failure to adhere to settlement terms, repeated adjournment requests, and non-compliance with court orders led to the dismissal of the petition and imposition of costs amounting to Rs. 25,000 to be paid to the respondent. The court emphasized the importance of timely justice and deterrence of dilatory tactics in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. en-us Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Aug 2023 07:26:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441365 The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's application under Section 311 Cr.P.C., finding the petitioner's conduct to be an abuse of the legal process. The petitioner's failure to adhere to settlement terms, repeated adjournment requests, and non-compliance with court orders led to the dismissal of the petition and imposition of costs amounting to Rs. 25,000 to be paid to the respondent. The court emphasized the importance of timely justice and deterrence of dilatory tactics in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441365