<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1890 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to grant depreciation on the reinstated amount and adjust the depreciation for the relevant assessment year accordingly. The appeal challenging the enhanced disallowance of depreciation was successful, with the Tribunal emphasizing that depreciation should be allowed on assets added back to the &#039;block of assets&#039; even if not utilized in the relevant year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 21:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1890 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to grant depreciation on the reinstated amount and adjust the depreciation for the relevant assessment year accordingly. The appeal challenging the enhanced disallowance of depreciation was successful, with the Tribunal emphasizing that depreciation should be allowed on assets added back to the &#039;block of assets&#039; even if not utilized in the relevant year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>