<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1445 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309026</link>
    <description>Reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 may proceed during a pending appeal before the CIT(A) where it concerns transactions distinct from those examined in the original assessment or appellate proceedings. A reassessment notice concerning previously unexamined cash deposits was treated as based on an independent issue rather than a change of opinion, with the required reason to believe considered satisfied. The Assessing Officer&#039;s reassessment jurisdiction is not displaced by the CIT(A)&#039;s appellate powers under Section 251. Objections that replies were not adequately considered should be pursued through the statutory appellate mechanism, rather than writ jurisdiction, where the tax statute provides a complete assessment and reassessment framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1445 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309026</link>
      <description>Reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 may proceed during a pending appeal before the CIT(A) where it concerns transactions distinct from those examined in the original assessment or appellate proceedings. A reassessment notice concerning previously unexamined cash deposits was treated as based on an independent issue rather than a change of opinion, with the required reason to believe considered satisfied. The Assessing Officer&#039;s reassessment jurisdiction is not displaced by the CIT(A)&#039;s appellate powers under Section 251. Objections that replies were not adequately considered should be pursued through the statutory appellate mechanism, rather than writ jurisdiction, where the tax statute provides a complete assessment and reassessment framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>