<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1416 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309022</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT (E) directing the Assessing Officer to verify anonymous donations received by the assessee. It emphasized the importance of compliance with such directions and the need for proper examination during assessments to ensure the correctness of tax assessments. The Tribunal noted the failure of the Assessing Officer to follow the CIT (E)&#039;s directions, resulting in the upholding of the CIT (E)&#039;s order under section 263.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 21:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1416 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309022</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT (E) directing the Assessing Officer to verify anonymous donations received by the assessee. It emphasized the importance of compliance with such directions and the need for proper examination during assessments to ensure the correctness of tax assessments. The Tribunal noted the failure of the Assessing Officer to follow the CIT (E)&#039;s directions, resulting in the upholding of the CIT (E)&#039;s order under section 263.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>