https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309012 A revenue mutation order under the Jaipur Matmi Rules could not confer title or a legally enforceable right to succeed to the offices of Sajjadanashin and Mutawalli, because matmi operates only within revenue administration and does not extend to deciding succession to a spiritual or managerial office. The later suit was barred by res judicata since the earlier dispute over the Sajjadanashin office had attained finality, and an unauthorized revenue determination could not create a fresh cause of action. Revenue entries also did not establish ownership or exclusive possession, so no decree for possession could be supported on that basis. en-us Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Aug 2023 11:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309012 A revenue mutation order under the Jaipur Matmi Rules could not confer title or a legally enforceable right to succeed to the offices of Sajjadanashin and Mutawalli, because matmi operates only within revenue administration and does not extend to deciding succession to a spiritual or managerial office. The later suit was barred by res judicata since the earlier dispute over the Sajjadanashin office had attained finality, and an unauthorized revenue determination could not create a fresh cause of action. Revenue entries also did not establish ownership or exclusive possession, so no decree for possession could be supported on that basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309012