https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309011 The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and High Court, dismissing the appeal. It confirmed respondent No. 6 as more meritorious and eligible for the post of Extra Departmental Branch Post Master (EDBPM). The Court emphasized the importance of educational qualifications and marks obtained, supporting the CAT's direction to appoint respondent No. 6 based on merit. Despite the appellant's long tenure, the Court suggested considering her for a nearby vacancy if eligible, ensuring fairness to both parties. en-us Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Aug 2023 10:45:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309011 The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and High Court, dismissing the appeal. It confirmed respondent No. 6 as more meritorious and eligible for the post of Extra Departmental Branch Post Master (EDBPM). The Court emphasized the importance of educational qualifications and marks obtained, supporting the CAT's direction to appoint respondent No. 6 based on merit. Despite the appellant's long tenure, the Court suggested considering her for a nearby vacancy if eligible, ensuring fairness to both parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309011