https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441359 SC reviewed a case involving profiteering allegations against a real estate developer in the 'Bhagwati Eminence' project. After investigation, authorities found the developer had profiteered Rs. 1,56,77,149 in one project. However, no other projects were identified, and thus Section 171(1) of CGST Act, 2017 was not applicable. The proceedings were consequently dropped. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441359 SC reviewed a case involving profiteering allegations against a real estate developer in the 'Bhagwati Eminence' project. After investigation, authorities found the developer had profiteered Rs. 1,56,77,149 in one project. However, no other projects were identified, and thus Section 171(1) of CGST Act, 2017 was not applicable. The proceedings were consequently dropped. Case-Laws GST Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441359