<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 322 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441343</link>
    <description>An auditor must first verify that a branch-audit appointment is valid under the governing company law and professional conduct framework; mere acceptance of an appointment letter without checking mandatory approval requirements is insufficient and professionally blameworthy. The audit engagement must also comply with Standards on Auditing by maintaining contemporaneous documentation, performing proper planning and risk assessment, obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence, and supporting the audit opinion with recorded work and conclusions; failure to do so renders an unmodified opinion unsustainable. These lapses, including invalid acceptance, deficient documentation, and unsupported opinion, were treated as professional misconduct warranting disciplinary sanctions, including monetary penalty and debarment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2023 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 322 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441343</link>
      <description>An auditor must first verify that a branch-audit appointment is valid under the governing company law and professional conduct framework; mere acceptance of an appointment letter without checking mandatory approval requirements is insufficient and professionally blameworthy. The audit engagement must also comply with Standards on Auditing by maintaining contemporaneous documentation, performing proper planning and risk assessment, obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence, and supporting the audit opinion with recorded work and conclusions; failure to do so renders an unmodified opinion unsustainable. These lapses, including invalid acceptance, deficient documentation, and unsupported opinion, were treated as professional misconduct warranting disciplinary sanctions, including monetary penalty and debarment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>