<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 322 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441343</link>
    <description>CA Akash Goel was found guilty of accepting an audit appointment without complying with legal requirements and failing to adhere to Standards on Auditing. The EP&#039;s professional misconduct included lack of due diligence, negligence, and non-compliance with various SAs. As a result, a penalty of Rs 100,000 and a one-year debarment from audit-related roles were imposed under Section 132(4)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2023 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 322 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441343</link>
      <description>CA Akash Goel was found guilty of accepting an audit appointment without complying with legal requirements and failing to adhere to Standards on Auditing. The EP&#039;s professional misconduct included lack of due diligence, negligence, and non-compliance with various SAs. As a result, a penalty of Rs 100,000 and a one-year debarment from audit-related roles were imposed under Section 132(4)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>