https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441338 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax on 67% of the gross value of works contract services provided by the appellant. The appellant was held liable to pay service tax on 33% of the value. Additionally, services rendered to specific entities were exempt from service tax, relieving the appellant from paying tax on these services. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential relief, with the stay petition being disposed of. en-us Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Aug 2023 08:12:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441338 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax on 67% of the gross value of works contract services provided by the appellant. The appellant was held liable to pay service tax on 33% of the value. Additionally, services rendered to specific entities were exempt from service tax, relieving the appellant from paying tax on these services. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential relief, with the stay petition being disposed of. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441338