<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 310 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441331</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act was held unsustainable because it rested on assumptions rather than legally relevant jurisdictional facts such as new material, suppression, fraud, or misrepresentation; a mere change of opinion was insufficient, so the reassessment notice failed. The alleged stock transfers also could not be treated as inter-State sales on generalized inferences alone, because each transaction had to satisfy the statutory test that movement of goods was occasioned by the contract of sale or by transfer of title during movement. On that basis, the reassessment and consequential demand were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2023 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 310 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441331</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act was held unsustainable because it rested on assumptions rather than legally relevant jurisdictional facts such as new material, suppression, fraud, or misrepresentation; a mere change of opinion was insufficient, so the reassessment notice failed. The alleged stock transfers also could not be treated as inter-State sales on generalized inferences alone, because each transaction had to satisfy the statutory test that movement of goods was occasioned by the contract of sale or by transfer of title during movement. On that basis, the reassessment and consequential demand were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>