<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309006</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn after the assessee sought to withdraw it based on a jurisdictional issue arising from a merger, arguing that the jurisdiction now lay in Mumbai instead of Bangalore. The tribunal accepted the withdrawal request, allowing the possibility of filing a fresh appeal in Bangalore in alignment with recent legal precedents and ensuring proper adjudication of tax matters based on the entity&#039;s post-merger jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2023 22:48:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309006</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn after the assessee sought to withdraw it based on a jurisdictional issue arising from a merger, arguing that the jurisdiction now lay in Mumbai instead of Bangalore. The tribunal accepted the withdrawal request, allowing the possibility of filing a fresh appeal in Bangalore in alignment with recent legal precedents and ensuring proper adjudication of tax matters based on the entity&#039;s post-merger jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>