https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309005 The Madras HC declined to interfere with an assessment under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 where the dispute turned on the correctness of Form F documents and the petitioner had statutory appeal and revision remedies. It held that disputed factual issues relating to Form F could not be examined in writ proceedings under Article 226, given the limited scope of writ interference. The assessment, including differential tax and penalty, was therefore left undisturbed and the petitioner was relegated to the alternate remedies available under the Act. en-us Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 06 Aug 2023 22:48:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309005 The Madras HC declined to interfere with an assessment under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 where the dispute turned on the correctness of Form F documents and the petitioner had statutory appeal and revision remedies. It held that disputed factual issues relating to Form F could not be examined in writ proceedings under Article 226, given the limited scope of writ interference. The assessment, including differential tax and penalty, was therefore left undisturbed and the petitioner was relegated to the alternate remedies available under the Act. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309005