<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 1162 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309005</link>
    <description>The Court limited its interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and granted the petitioner 30 days to pursue remedies under Sections 51 or 84 of the TNVAT Act. The original impugned order was directed to be returned, and the writ petition was disposed of with no costs, concluding the matter and closing the connected miscellaneous petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2023 22:48:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 1162 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309005</link>
      <description>The Court limited its interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and granted the petitioner 30 days to pursue remedies under Sections 51 or 84 of the TNVAT Act. The original impugned order was directed to be returned, and the writ petition was disposed of with no costs, concluding the matter and closing the connected miscellaneous petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>