<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 349 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33549</link>
    <description>A proprietary concern seeking more time to complete the pre-deposit under a Tribunal stay order was granted relief after showing partial compliance and severe financial hardship. The Tribunal accepted that sufficient funds were not available to meet the balance pre-deposit and exercised its discretion to extend the time by three months. Compliance was directed to be reported by the specified date, making the extension conditional on timely completion of the stay terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 349 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33549</link>
      <description>A proprietary concern seeking more time to complete the pre-deposit under a Tribunal stay order was granted relief after showing partial compliance and severe financial hardship. The Tribunal accepted that sufficient funds were not available to meet the balance pre-deposit and exercised its discretion to extend the time by three months. Compliance was directed to be reported by the specified date, making the extension conditional on timely completion of the stay terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>