<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 348 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33548</link>
    <description>Where service tax and interest were paid before the show-cause notice and the assessee disputed the levy on merits, insistence on pre-deposit of the penalty amount was considered unnecessary. The Tribunal accepted that several grounds had been raised against penalty and found that waiver of pre-deposit was justified. The stay application was accordingly allowed in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 348 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33548</link>
      <description>Where service tax and interest were paid before the show-cause notice and the assessee disputed the levy on merits, insistence on pre-deposit of the penalty amount was considered unnecessary. The Tribunal accepted that several grounds had been raised against penalty and found that waiver of pre-deposit was justified. The stay application was accordingly allowed in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>