<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 306 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441327</link>
    <description>Punjab and Haryana HC granted regular bail to petitioner charged under Section 132 of CGST Act, 2017 for allegedly availing ITC in relation to firms. Court noted petitioner had already undergone custody for over two years against maximum sentence of five years imprisonment. Trial was likely delayed due to pending constitutional challenge by co-accused regarding CGST Act provisions. Court found no useful purpose in continued detention and granted bail with conditions including furnishing bonds, informing police of residential address, and warning that bail could be cancelled if petitioner interfered with witnesses or evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 306 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441327</link>
      <description>Punjab and Haryana HC granted regular bail to petitioner charged under Section 132 of CGST Act, 2017 for allegedly availing ITC in relation to firms. Court noted petitioner had already undergone custody for over two years against maximum sentence of five years imprisonment. Trial was likely delayed due to pending constitutional challenge by co-accused regarding CGST Act provisions. Court found no useful purpose in continued detention and granted bail with conditions including furnishing bonds, informing police of residential address, and warning that bail could be cancelled if petitioner interfered with witnesses or evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>