<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 305 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441326</link>
    <description>HC ruled in contractor&#039;s favor, mandating government reimburse additional GST rate differential from 12% to 18% for state highway project. Court directed government to allocate budget and pay the differential amount within 45 days, with right to file recovery suit if payment is not made. Writ petition was allowed without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 305 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441326</link>
      <description>HC ruled in contractor&#039;s favor, mandating government reimburse additional GST rate differential from 12% to 18% for state highway project. Court directed government to allocate budget and pay the differential amount within 45 days, with right to file recovery suit if payment is not made. Writ petition was allowed without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>