<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 301 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441322</link>
    <description>The HC examined a GST appeal challenging a tax assessment order. The court partially ruled in favor of the petitioner by staying the remaining tax demand, subject to depositing 10% of the disputed amount. The Standing Counsel argued for tax liability and procedural compliance, while highlighting the delay in appeal filing. The case was adjourned pending constitution of the 2nd appellate tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 301 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441322</link>
      <description>The HC examined a GST appeal challenging a tax assessment order. The court partially ruled in favor of the petitioner by staying the remaining tax demand, subject to depositing 10% of the disputed amount. The Standing Counsel argued for tax liability and procedural compliance, while highlighting the delay in appeal filing. The case was adjourned pending constitution of the 2nd appellate tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>