<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 300 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441321</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s claim for GST refund by directing submission of fresh representation to appropriate authorities. The court mandated authorities to review the claim within 60 days, considering similar precedents from other state departments, and ensure fair assessment of excess GST paid due to rate changes in works contract.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 300 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441321</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s claim for GST refund by directing submission of fresh representation to appropriate authorities. The court mandated authorities to review the claim within 60 days, considering similar precedents from other state departments, and ensure fair assessment of excess GST paid due to rate changes in works contract.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>