<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 298 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441319</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the interpretation of Section 47 (xa) regarding the date of acquisition of bonds and underlying shares, emphasizing the distinction between the 1993 and 2008 schemes. It affirmed the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the special leave petitions and disposing of any pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 298 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441319</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the interpretation of Section 47 (xa) regarding the date of acquisition of bonds and underlying shares, emphasizing the distinction between the 1993 and 2008 schemes. It affirmed the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the special leave petitions and disposing of any pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>