<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 283 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the disallowance of the &#039;surrender right fee&#039; claimed by the assessee as a business expenditure. The compensation paid for breach of contractual obligations was considered wholly and exclusively for business purposes, in line with Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the payment was justified and allowable, referencing relevant case law supporting deductions for breach of contract compensation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2023 08:05:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 283 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the disallowance of the &#039;surrender right fee&#039; claimed by the assessee as a business expenditure. The compensation paid for breach of contractual obligations was considered wholly and exclusively for business purposes, in line with Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the payment was justified and allowable, referencing relevant case law supporting deductions for breach of contract compensation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>