<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 276 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441297</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the ULIP policy should be treated as a &#039;capital asset&#039; under section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act. The accretion on surrender of the policy was directed to be taxed under &#039;income from capital gains,&#039; providing relief to the assessee on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2023 08:05:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 276 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441297</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the ULIP policy should be treated as a &#039;capital asset&#039; under section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act. The accretion on surrender of the policy was directed to be taxed under &#039;income from capital gains,&#039; providing relief to the assessee on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>