<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 273 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441294</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 2.3 crore addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue failed to disprove the documentary evidence provided by the assessee, shifting the burden of proof. The appeal was dismissed as the Revenue did not present material to counter the evidence, leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 273 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441294</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 2.3 crore addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue failed to disprove the documentary evidence provided by the assessee, shifting the burden of proof. The appeal was dismissed as the Revenue did not present material to counter the evidence, leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>