<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 248 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on bank charges deducted by foreign banks. It determined that the foreign bank was the service provider and the Indian bank was the service recipient responsible for the service tax under the reverse charge mechanism. The appellant&#039;s liability was negated as they only received services from the Indian bank, making the Indian bank liable for the service tax. The Tribunal set aside the demand, remanding the matter for quantification verification and determining any direct payment liabilities to foreign banks. The impugned orders were overturned, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 10:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 248 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on bank charges deducted by foreign banks. It determined that the foreign bank was the service provider and the Indian bank was the service recipient responsible for the service tax under the reverse charge mechanism. The appellant&#039;s liability was negated as they only received services from the Indian bank, making the Indian bank liable for the service tax. The Tribunal set aside the demand, remanding the matter for quantification verification and determining any direct payment liabilities to foreign banks. The impugned orders were overturned, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>