<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 242 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441263</link>
    <description>The Appellate Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to medical reasons. The High Court upheld this decision. The High Court also allowed the appellant to deposit 25% of the compensation pending appeal, with a directive for payment within 60 days. The Court permitted the transfer of the Criminal Appeal to a different court for convenience, leaving the decision to the Principal District Judge, North Goa, with the aim of expeditious resolution within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2023 07:17:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 242 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441263</link>
      <description>The Appellate Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to medical reasons. The High Court upheld this decision. The High Court also allowed the appellant to deposit 25% of the compensation pending appeal, with a directive for payment within 60 days. The Court permitted the transfer of the Criminal Appeal to a different court for convenience, leaving the decision to the Principal District Judge, North Goa, with the aim of expeditious resolution within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>