https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308991 Kerala HC dismissed an intra-court appeal challenging a single judge's interpretation of tender conditions regarding GST inclusion. The court upheld the finding that Clause 3.3.3 clearly excluded GST component from tender amounts. Applying the principle that ambiguity in contract terms benefits the non-maker rather than the maker (corporation), the court confirmed that respondents must pay GST separately as per contract terms. The single judge's decision was deemed judicious without improper interference in contractual matters, resulting in appeal dismissal. en-us Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308991 Kerala HC dismissed an intra-court appeal challenging a single judge's interpretation of tender conditions regarding GST inclusion. The court upheld the finding that Clause 3.3.3 clearly excluded GST component from tender amounts. Applying the principle that ambiguity in contract terms benefits the non-maker rather than the maker (corporation), the court confirmed that respondents must pay GST separately as per contract terms. The single judge's decision was deemed judicious without improper interference in contractual matters, resulting in appeal dismissal. Case-Laws GST Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308991