<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 226 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441247</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi, comprising HON&#039;BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER and HON&#039;BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA, disposed of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner. The impugned order and demand notice were quashed as they were found unsustainable based on the legal precedents. Pending applications were closed, and the parties were directed to act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 226 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441247</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi, comprising HON&#039;BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER and HON&#039;BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA, disposed of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner. The impugned order and demand notice were quashed as they were found unsustainable based on the legal precedents. Pending applications were closed, and the parties were directed to act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>