<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 206 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441227</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking to delay departmental proceedings until the conclusion of criminal proceedings, emphasizing the independence of the different types of proceedings. The court directed the Inquiry Officer to consider the petitioner&#039;s request for cross-examination under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, highlighting the importance of procedural fairness and the right to cross-examination in departmental inquiries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 07:49:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 206 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441227</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking to delay departmental proceedings until the conclusion of criminal proceedings, emphasizing the independence of the different types of proceedings. The court directed the Inquiry Officer to consider the petitioner&#039;s request for cross-examination under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, highlighting the importance of procedural fairness and the right to cross-examination in departmental inquiries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>