<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 185 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441206</link>
    <description>The judgment set aside the demand of service tax under Issue No. II and for the period before the service became taxable under Issue No. I. The adjudicating authority was directed to verify if service tax was paid correctly and to allow the appellant to produce relevant documents for CENVAT credit under Issue No. III. The penalty and interest were to be modified accordingly. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 07:48:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 185 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441206</link>
      <description>The judgment set aside the demand of service tax under Issue No. II and for the period before the service became taxable under Issue No. I. The adjudicating authority was directed to verify if service tax was paid correctly and to allow the appellant to produce relevant documents for CENVAT credit under Issue No. III. The penalty and interest were to be modified accordingly. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>