<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 180 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441201</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the report of the Fact-Finding Committee on ownership of seized goods. The petitioners failed to substantiate their ownership claims adequately, with only one petitioner submitting evidence. As a result, the court found no grounds to grant the requested reliefs and disposed of the petitions, allowing the petitioners to pursue further legal action based on the committee&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 07:48:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 180 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441201</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the report of the Fact-Finding Committee on ownership of seized goods. The petitioners failed to substantiate their ownership claims adequately, with only one petitioner submitting evidence. As a result, the court found no grounds to grant the requested reliefs and disposed of the petitions, allowing the petitioners to pursue further legal action based on the committee&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>