<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 178 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441199</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Trial Court&#039;s decision, concluding that the plaintiffs failed to prove the borrowal or execution of the promissory note and memorandum of deposit of title deeds. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 07:48:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 178 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441199</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Trial Court&#039;s decision, concluding that the plaintiffs failed to prove the borrowal or execution of the promissory note and memorandum of deposit of title deeds. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>