<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1504 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308971</link>
    <description>Investment and conversion arrangements under trust, shareholding and debenture agreements were assessed as a whole to determine whether they created indirect acquisition of control over the target companies. The decisive factors were that management and voting control remained with the original promoters and their entities, the convertible debentures carried no voting rights, and the conversion option had not been exercised. On that basis, the structure was treated as an investment arrangement rather than an immediate transfer of control, so no disclosure obligation or open offer requirement was triggered and the complaint was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 21:14:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1504 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308971</link>
      <description>Investment and conversion arrangements under trust, shareholding and debenture agreements were assessed as a whole to determine whether they created indirect acquisition of control over the target companies. The decisive factors were that management and voting control remained with the original promoters and their entities, the convertible debentures carried no voting rights, and the conversion option had not been exercised. On that basis, the structure was treated as an investment arrangement rather than an immediate transfer of control, so no disclosure obligation or open offer requirement was triggered and the complaint was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>