<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 730 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308961</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned communication was set aside. Respondent no.1 was directed to issue a fresh communication within two weeks, using 28.6.2008 as the reference date for calculating the offer price and allowing the appellant reasonable time to open the offer before imposing any interest liability. No order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 13:20:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 730 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308961</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned communication was set aside. Respondent no.1 was directed to issue a fresh communication within two weeks, using 28.6.2008 as the reference date for calculating the offer price and allowing the appellant reasonable time to open the offer before imposing any interest liability. No order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>