<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1446 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308957</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the applicability of SEBI regulations to the appellants as promoters and acquirers. The appellants&#039; failure to comply with reporting requirements under regulations 3(4) and 3(5) was upheld. Additionally, the tribunal endorsed the interpretation of regulation 11(2) on the consolidation of holdings and upheld the penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 11:38:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1446 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308957</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the applicability of SEBI regulations to the appellants as promoters and acquirers. The appellants&#039; failure to comply with reporting requirements under regulations 3(4) and 3(5) was upheld. Additionally, the tribunal endorsed the interpretation of regulation 11(2) on the consolidation of holdings and upheld the penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>