<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 272 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal that denied SSI exemption by combining clearances of two partnership units without distinguishing the real manufacturer and the dummy unit. The lack of identification of units was deemed a fundamental flaw in the proceedings. The appellants demonstrated the independent existence of each unit through various evidence. The Tribunal found the Department&#039;s failure to identify units and impose penalties as flawed and lacking legal merit. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the appeals were allowed, emphasizing the importance of correctly identifying units in excise duty matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 272 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal that denied SSI exemption by combining clearances of two partnership units without distinguishing the real manufacturer and the dummy unit. The lack of identification of units was deemed a fundamental flaw in the proceedings. The appellants demonstrated the independent existence of each unit through various evidence. The Tribunal found the Department&#039;s failure to identify units and impose penalties as flawed and lacking legal merit. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the appeals were allowed, emphasizing the importance of correctly identifying units in excise duty matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>