<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 141 - ITAT AHMADABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441162</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeals by reducing the unexplained cash addition to Rs. 82,825 and the penalty to Rs. 10,000. It found the AO exceeded jurisdiction in limited scrutiny, limiting the cash deposits considered to the demonetization period. The penalty was reduced based on a Delhi Tribunal decision, emphasizing fairness in penalty imposition for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 141 - ITAT AHMADABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441162</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeals by reducing the unexplained cash addition to Rs. 82,825 and the penalty to Rs. 10,000. It found the AO exceeded jurisdiction in limited scrutiny, limiting the cash deposits considered to the demonetization period. The penalty was reduced based on a Delhi Tribunal decision, emphasizing fairness in penalty imposition for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>