https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441147 The tribunal ruled against the appellant in a case involving liability to pay service tax under 'Real Estate Agent Service.' It found the appellant acted as a middleman in land transactions, contrary to the appellant's arguments. The tribunal upheld the service tax demand and interest but set aside penalties under Sections 77 & 78 due to the appellant's genuine belief that the transactions were not covered under 'Real Estate Agent Service.' The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the order accordingly. en-us Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Aug 2023 07:53:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441147 The tribunal ruled against the appellant in a case involving liability to pay service tax under 'Real Estate Agent Service.' It found the appellant acted as a middleman in land transactions, contrary to the appellant's arguments. The tribunal upheld the service tax demand and interest but set aside penalties under Sections 77 & 78 due to the appellant's genuine belief that the transactions were not covered under 'Real Estate Agent Service.' The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the order accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441147