<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 122 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441143</link>
    <description>Transportation of effluent generated during effluent treatment was outside Goods Transport Agency service because the term &quot;goods&quot; under the service tax framework is taken from section 2(7) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930. As the effluent was waste meant for disposal and was neither sold nor saleable in the market, it did not qualify as goods. On that basis, the transport activity was not liable to service tax under the GTA head, and the demand could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 122 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441143</link>
      <description>Transportation of effluent generated during effluent treatment was outside Goods Transport Agency service because the term &quot;goods&quot; under the service tax framework is taken from section 2(7) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930. As the effluent was waste meant for disposal and was neither sold nor saleable in the market, it did not qualify as goods. On that basis, the transport activity was not liable to service tax under the GTA head, and the demand could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>