<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Demand Set Aside: Department Fails to Prove Bought-Out Items Were Integral to Appellants&#039; Manufactured Equipment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71272</link>
    <description>Valuation - non-inclusion of value of certain bought out items - In the instant case, the Department could not prove conclusively that the bought-out items in dispute are integral part of the equipment manufactured; Department did not even prove that the same are fitted into the system, manufactured by the appellants, at least by the use of screwdriver technology. - Demand set aside - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 07:53:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 07:53:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Demand Set Aside: Department Fails to Prove Bought-Out Items Were Integral to Appellants&#039; Manufactured Equipment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71272</link>
      <description>Valuation - non-inclusion of value of certain bought out items - In the instant case, the Department could not prove conclusively that the bought-out items in dispute are integral part of the equipment manufactured; Department did not even prove that the same are fitted into the system, manufactured by the appellants, at least by the use of screwdriver technology. - Demand set aside - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 07:53:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>