<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 110 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441131</link>
    <description>The court found the toll collection by the first respondent to be discriminatory and not genuinely compensatory. The writ petition was allowed, setting aside the impugned order. The court emphasized the need for uniform application of tolls and avoidance of targeting specific entities unfairly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 07:52:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 110 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441131</link>
      <description>The court found the toll collection by the first respondent to be discriminatory and not genuinely compensatory. The writ petition was allowed, setting aside the impugned order. The court emphasized the need for uniform application of tolls and avoidance of targeting specific entities unfairly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>