<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1661 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the DRP&#039;s decisions on the upward adjustment of Corporate and Bank Guarantee charges and the downward adjustment of trademark license fee. However, the issue of disallowance u/s.14A of the Act r.w Rule-8D was remitted back to the AO for further verification based on relevant case law. The appeals were decided accordingly, with the Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed and the assessee&#039;s appeal treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 21:18:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1661 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the DRP&#039;s decisions on the upward adjustment of Corporate and Bank Guarantee charges and the downward adjustment of trademark license fee. However, the issue of disallowance u/s.14A of the Act r.w Rule-8D was remitted back to the AO for further verification based on relevant case law. The appeals were decided accordingly, with the Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed and the assessee&#039;s appeal treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>