<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1501 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that no adjustment for prior period expenses of Rs. 46,64,504/- was necessary in computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was partially allowed in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that prior period expenses should be included in the net profit calculation as per relevant accounting standards and Schedule VI of the Companies Act. The decision was issued on 21/01/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1501 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that no adjustment for prior period expenses of Rs. 46,64,504/- was necessary in computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was partially allowed in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that prior period expenses should be included in the net profit calculation as per relevant accounting standards and Schedule VI of the Companies Act. The decision was issued on 21/01/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>