<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 701 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308934</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and reinstating the decisions of the Rent Control Court and the Appellate Authority. The High Court was found to have exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by overturning the concurrent findings on default in rent payment, acts of waste causing damage to the building, and acts of nuisance to other occupants without sufficient justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 12:52:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 701 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308934</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and reinstating the decisions of the Rent Control Court and the Appellate Authority. The High Court was found to have exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by overturning the concurrent findings on default in rent payment, acts of waste causing damage to the building, and acts of nuisance to other occupants without sufficient justification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>