https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308934 Revisional jurisdiction under the rent control statute is supervisory and limited to examining legality, regularity and propriety; it does not permit substitution of the revisional court's view of evidence for concurrent factual findings unless those findings are illegal, irregular or wholly unreasonable. The High Court therefore could not overturn the findings on eviction. Nuisance requires actionable interference affecting occupants or neighbours, rather than trivial inconvenience or noise, while waste requires conduct materially impairing the building's value or utility. As neither actionable nuisance nor material impairment was established, eviction could not be sustained. en-us Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Aug 2023 12:52:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308934 Revisional jurisdiction under the rent control statute is supervisory and limited to examining legality, regularity and propriety; it does not permit substitution of the revisional court's view of evidence for concurrent factual findings unless those findings are illegal, irregular or wholly unreasonable. The High Court therefore could not overturn the findings on eviction. Nuisance requires actionable interference affecting occupants or neighbours, rather than trivial inconvenience or noise, while waste requires conduct materially impairing the building's value or utility. As neither actionable nuisance nor material impairment was established, eviction could not be sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308934