<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 394 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33503</link>
    <description>Condensing units of split air-conditioners cleared as such were not treated as complete air-conditioning machines for special excise duty. The Tribunal noted that central excise classification depends on the character of the manufactured goods as cleared from the assessee&#039;s premises, not on later use or buyer identification. It also read Chapter Heading 84.15 as covering air-conditioning machines with a motor-driven fan and elements for changing temperature and humidity, which these goods lacked. As the department&#039;s material did not displace the statutory description or establish mis-declaration, the demand was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 394 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33503</link>
      <description>Condensing units of split air-conditioners cleared as such were not treated as complete air-conditioning machines for special excise duty. The Tribunal noted that central excise classification depends on the character of the manufactured goods as cleared from the assessee&#039;s premises, not on later use or buyer identification. It also read Chapter Heading 84.15 as covering air-conditioning machines with a motor-driven fan and elements for changing temperature and humidity, which these goods lacked. As the department&#039;s material did not displace the statutory description or establish mis-declaration, the demand was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>