<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 110 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to claim a refund of Cenvat credit on input services for the period before the introduction of Notification No. 5/2006-CE (NT) dated 14.03.2006. The Tribunal held that Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules permitted such refunds even before the specific notification, citing relevant legal precedents. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, emphasizing the appellants&#039; entitlement to the refund based on the rule&#039;s provisions and established case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 110 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to claim a refund of Cenvat credit on input services for the period before the introduction of Notification No. 5/2006-CE (NT) dated 14.03.2006. The Tribunal held that Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules permitted such refunds even before the specific notification, citing relevant legal precedents. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, emphasizing the appellants&#039; entitlement to the refund based on the rule&#039;s provisions and established case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>