https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308928 The Court allowed exemption from court fees subject to all just exceptions and disposed of that application. It refused condonation of a 1110-day delay in re-filing the appeal, holding that the Department's explanation based on change of Standing Counsel and non-communication by earlier counsel was not plausible. The Court stressed that the Department must actively monitor its appeals, including through the High Court cell under the supervision of a Deputy CIT, and ensure proper follow-up of matters entrusted to panel counsel. As the delay was inordinate and inadequately explained, condonation was declined and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Dec 2023 17:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308928 The Court allowed exemption from court fees subject to all just exceptions and disposed of that application. It refused condonation of a 1110-day delay in re-filing the appeal, holding that the Department's explanation based on change of Standing Counsel and non-communication by earlier counsel was not plausible. The Court stressed that the Department must actively monitor its appeals, including through the High Court cell under the supervision of a Deputy CIT, and ensure proper follow-up of matters entrusted to panel counsel. As the delay was inordinate and inadequately explained, condonation was declined and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308928