<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 104 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441125</link>
    <description>The HC examined a provisional attachment order under CGST Act, challenging its validity due to procedural irregularities. The Court directed the petitioner to file objections under Rule 159(5) within two weeks and instructed the respondent to decide expeditiously. The writ petition was disposed of with procedural guidance, emphasizing administrative remedies before judicial intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 104 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441125</link>
      <description>The HC examined a provisional attachment order under CGST Act, challenging its validity due to procedural irregularities. The Court directed the petitioner to file objections under Rule 159(5) within two weeks and instructed the respondent to decide expeditiously. The writ petition was disposed of with procedural guidance, emphasizing administrative remedies before judicial intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>