<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 93 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441114</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the notice under Section 148A(b) and the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act due to delay in service and technical glitches, including an inchoate digital signature. The court upheld the petitioner&#039;s argument that the proceedings were time-barred, leading to the disposal of the writ petition and the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 93 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441114</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the notice under Section 148A(b) and the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act due to delay in service and technical glitches, including an inchoate digital signature. The court upheld the petitioner&#039;s argument that the proceedings were time-barred, leading to the disposal of the writ petition and the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>