<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 139 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that there was no legal provision for a second review by the Committee of Commissioners in a case involving a delay in filing an appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that decisions not to file an appeal could not be later reviewed, leading to the dismissal of the condonation of delay application and subsequent appeals. The judgment clarified the limitations on second reviews by Committees of Commissioners, highlighting the finality of decisions not to file appeals and the inappropriateness of higher authorities influencing such decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 139 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that there was no legal provision for a second review by the Committee of Commissioners in a case involving a delay in filing an appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that decisions not to file an appeal could not be later reviewed, leading to the dismissal of the condonation of delay application and subsequent appeals. The judgment clarified the limitations on second reviews by Committees of Commissioners, highlighting the finality of decisions not to file appeals and the inappropriateness of higher authorities influencing such decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>